A friend of mine suggested that I should read the books of Chomsky. She showed me one that she was reading but was not willing to give it up so I could borrow it. She just could not part with that book and I simply could not understand it when she had lent me numerous book before. That is, until I finally got a copy of this and another of Chomsky's books (Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy) for myself and started reading them.
True, Chomsky's perspective is rather from the left side of the spectrum and the conversations (with David Barsamian) documented in this book are quite choppy both in topic and in depth of coverage, but his analysis of the US government's policies are well proven in the facts of history and the daily news. Even if the population at large is spoon-fed some saviour-like efforts from the high ranks of power, and grand visions of democratizing (whatever that means nowadays) the world. All this while the world's despise for US foreign policy is at an all-time high.
I found Chomsky's points very strong and thought provoking, albeit inconsistent on occasion. The book is an interesting read, difficult to put down, while one really would have to filter the statements with some healthy common sense and caution.
"His caustic denunciations of American 'war crimes'-comparisons to Nazi Germany are never far from hand-serve up plenty of red meat for his legions of fans on the disaffected left, but the discursive, unsystematic format is not the best introduction for readers unfamiliar with his nonconformist views" - writes the Publishers Weekly. Interesting to note in this criticism that its base-line problem with Chomsky is "his nonconformist views". Since when is conformism a virtue and lack of it fallacy?
True, Chomsky's perspective is rather from the left side of the spectrum and the conversations (with David Barsamian) documented in this book are quite choppy both in topic and in depth of coverage, but his analysis of the US government's policies are well proven in the facts of history and the daily news. Even if the population at large is spoon-fed some saviour-like efforts from the high ranks of power, and grand visions of democratizing (whatever that means nowadays) the world. All this while the world's despise for US foreign policy is at an all-time high.
I found Chomsky's points very strong and thought provoking, albeit inconsistent on occasion. The book is an interesting read, difficult to put down, while one really would have to filter the statements with some healthy common sense and caution.
"His caustic denunciations of American 'war crimes'-comparisons to Nazi Germany are never far from hand-serve up plenty of red meat for his legions of fans on the disaffected left, but the discursive, unsystematic format is not the best introduction for readers unfamiliar with his nonconformist views" - writes the Publishers Weekly. Interesting to note in this criticism that its base-line problem with Chomsky is "his nonconformist views". Since when is conformism a virtue and lack of it fallacy?